JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 9, 1992

A- de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Carlos Jose Castro Fresneda

✓
Topic · hard data
Rechazo De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Rechazó la demanda de la referencia dando cumplimiento al artículo 6º, inciso 4º.

Decreto 2067 de 1991, el cual dispone que se rechazarán las demandas que recaigan sobre normas amparadas por una sentencia que hubiere hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada, en este sentido, la Corte Suprema de Justicia anteriormente declaró exequible el artículo 17 de la Ley 20 de 1972.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la presente demanda.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia procede el recurso de súplica ante la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  3. Tercero. En firme esta decisión, públiquese, insértese en la Gaceta Constituciobnal y archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.